Explore Extensive Offshore Options for Trading in Foreign Exchange

Bahrains ibdar bank eyes larger deals after three way merger


Dec 2 Bahrain's Ibdar Bank hopes to leverage the combined expertise of its predecessor banks and a larger balance sheet to win business which its three legacy banks struggled to individually, its chief investment officer told Reuters in an interview. Ibdar was launched as a brand on Monday following the merger of Capivest, Elaf Bank and Capital Management House, after more than a year of negotiations between the Bahraini lenders and authorities. Bahrain's banking industry is streamlining, aided by a central bank policy encouraging mergers and acquisitions, after it struggled in the aftermath of the global financial crisis and political unrest which deterred some foreign investment."2013 was a year we focused on integration, where we laid the foundations, 2014 is hopefully a fresh start for us," said chief investment officer Mohamed Aljasim. The Islamic lender now has $300 million of paid up capital, $329 million in equity and assets of $360 million, which it hopes can help it win deals in its focus areas of capital markets, private equity and real estate."There were a lot of opportunities that each of the legacy banks could not do individually, as it was too big or they couldn't close the transactions. We now have a bigger balance sheet, it opens the door to greater opportunities for us."

Ibdar is not leveraged and will retain Elaf Bank's licence in Malaysia to support a geographical scope that includes the Middle East, North Africa and Turkey, Aljasim said. In the past, the three lenders were involved in financing, advisory work and portfolio management in the aviation, shipping, infrastructure and real estate sectors, which Ibdar aims to maintain while disposing of non-core assets. Ibdar would launch new products along these same business lines, said Aljasim, without elaborating on the timing or size of future transactions.

"The business lines will continue, not one will out-shine the other."The merger is a rare example of a successful consolidation of Gulf Arab banks, helping the tiny kingdom's standing as a regional banking sector against growing competition from the likes of Dubai, Abu Dhabi and Doha. Although the commercial rationale for consolidation is largely accepted, Gulf bank mergers are uncommon because main shareholders, often powerful local families, are reluctant to cede control and can demand exaggerated valuations.

"In terms of the process, which started in June 2011, it was shareholder-driven which made it easier to execute. The framework avoided a lot of the issues of valuation and other issues that can come in-between," Aljasim said. The merger comes at a time when several other Bahraini banks are considering mergers of their own. Islamic lender Al Salam Bank said in September it had agreed to merge with fellow Bahraini lender BMI Bank, an affiliate of Oman's Bank Muscat, through a share swap. Khaleeji Commercial Bank, 47 percent owned by Gulf Finance House, said in June it was evaluating a potential merger with local lender Bank Al Khair. In March, National Bank of Bahrain and a local pension fund bought a 51.6-percent stake in Bahrain Islamic Bank from Kuwait's Investment Dar in a deal worth around $92.6 million.

Breakingviews us money market funds cant have it both ways


(The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are her own.)U.S. money market funds can't have it both ways. Lobbyists are trying to stifle reforms in the $2.7 trillion money market industry, while Bill Dudley, the president of the New York Federal Reserve, is throwing his support behind changes Mary Schapiro, the Securities and Exchange Commission chairman, wants proposed.

For years, money market funds have been hawked as safe but higher-yielding alternatives to traditional bank accounts. Yet the run that began when the Reserve Primary Fund "broke the buck" - meaning it marked down its net asset value from the traditional $1 a share - in September 2008 proved that there were incremental risks, and prompted an industry-wide government rescue. Schapiro wants to make the industry capable of saving itself. The simplest, most transparent way would be to force funds to quote a floating NAV based on the worth of their investments rather than a flat $1 per share. That's logical, but the fund industry is dead against it.

The other regulatory option would let money market funds peg their NAVs, but would require them to build in cushions to ensure they can actually afford to let investors redeem shares at that price. The first layer of protection might be a small capital buffer so there's no question of a fund manager's ability to top up the fund in the event of small losses. In an article for Bloomberg, Dudley also suggests that big investors - those with more than $50,000 in a fund, in his example - could only be allowed to withdraw 95 percent of their cash immediately, with the rest available a month later but subject to losses if the fund loses money on its holdings.

Money market fund folk bristle at the extra costs such rules could bring, but Dudley's financial stability concern is warranted. Money market funds provide nearly $200 billion to the financial sector in short-term loans and about $600 billion to the tri-party repo market, where banks, institutional investors and others go to fund short-term trades, according to Dudley. A run on money markets could, therefore, infect the broader financial system. The SEC mulled proposing reforms by the end of this month, according to news reports. However, several of Schapiro's four SEC commissioner colleagues seem to be skeptical. Dudley's support just might help. Money market funds can't go on claiming ultra low risk while having no obligation to hold a buffer. Something needs to give.